NAKED SUPERBIKE COMPARISON TEST REVIEW

Three naked superbikes go into the cage. Only one comes out.

Naked-Superbikes-Comparo-action-3

An exciting trend is gaining traction, a movement owed much to the fat, smoking burnout laid down by the Cycle World Ten Best winning Aprilia Tuono V4 R APRC ABS. Rumors of gnarly nakeds from multiple manufacturers have been brewing ever since the Italian brand raised the stakes with the debut of its RSV4-based super standard two years ago. Speculate no more, as this is the year of the naked, complete with all-new superbike standards leading the way.
Distilling this year’s bumper crop of top contenders has given us three very different engine configurations driving a common theme: red-hot performance tempered with a bit of real-world refinement and comfort.
Entering the cage for a heads-up bout with Aprilia’s 1,000cc V-4 is the inline-four-powered BMW S1000R and a booming 1,301cc V-twin KTM 1290 Super Duke R. Our combatants all weigh within 20 pounds of one another and produce about 150 rear-wheel horsepower. Each features comprehensive electronic rider aids with selectable power delivery modes, traction control, wheelie control, and sport-oriented ABS. BMW takes this a step further with cruise control and suspension featuring DDC (Dynamic Damping Control).
While each bike here packs a knockout punch and enough kicks to go around, there’s no split decision when it comes to title fights in Ten Best balloting. With this in mind, we planned a real-world test route full of mean streets and high mountain passes.

Aprilia-Tuono-V4-R-static-2
Joining me were the two Ryans, CW testers Ryan Dudek and Ryan Orr. Both are wicked fast on the street and also pro-level dirt riders, a perfect mix of all-around skill for bull-by-the-horns bikes like these. We saddled up and rode east toward California’s Lake Arrowhead in search of the perfect ride. You can’t get anywhere in Southern California without getting brutalized on the freeway. Having a sporty motorcycle that can cope with bumpy and menacing 14-lane-wide superslab is key to survival.
The KTM is the wild animal of the group and growls at you a bit for droning along at freeway cruise. Its engine pulse emits a hint of coarse vibration felt in the grips that, while not an irritant, contrasts with the silky smoothness of the other two. Ergo-wise, the Duke feels narrow, has a bit more leg room, and the shortest reach to the highest handlebar of the three. “The ergonomics are perfect for my 5-foot-10 frame with plenty of room from seat to peg,” Orr noted of the KTM. “The saddle fits well and has great foam to keep the butt alive on those long rides.” Dudek, a lankier 5-foot-11, countered with, “The saddle is wretched—don’t know if it’s the curvature or the forward slope that encourages wedgies.”
While the Aprilia’s firm saddle and rearset peg position make no apology for its superbike heritage (as is true with the others), we found the tapered-aluminum bar offers plenty of lower back relief, though the reach to the bar was farthest.
BMW offers the best of both worlds opined Dudek, who picked it as “the most well-rounded bike and also the most comfortable.” Orr agreed. “The ergos let you sit down into the bike, helping build that confidence that you are one with the road.”

BMW-S1000R-static-2
It was a feeling that soon came into play as we took the off-ramp headed for the twisties. For all the miles of cabin-lined roads we traveled riding various paces and trading bikes, the real payoff came on a 5-mile ribbon between Crestline and Silverwood Lake. Repeated runs through this concentration of first-, second- and third-gear corners allowed for back-to-back impressions as we rotated through the bikes.
While KTM’s tractable delivery felt unrivaled with TC toggled off, the proliferation of electronics on these bikes has become the great equalizer. The benefit of a flexible and predictably responsive engine remains, however, as the booming twin delivers a broad spread of torque that nearly negates proper gear selection. “It feels like the rear tire grips the ground with every thump,” Dudek said. “I can be lazy with shifting and it still comes alive right off the bottom.” The flip side is when you let revs rise, and the KTM breathes fire on top.
The Super Duke is also very nimble in turns, nearly to a fault, as Orr discovered. “This bike’s chassis is very responsive to brake or throttle action. It will stand up in the turn on acceleration or tuck in with a hinge feel on braking,” Orr said. While I didn’t find the handling disconcerting, I pride myself in having a fluid technique. Of course, there’s also the softer throttle response of Street mode if needed.
Due to tall gearing and less torque output, the Tuono requires more frequent use of the gearbox. Not such a bad trait, though, since its soul-stirring exhaust note and slick quickshift action rival the exhilaration of squeezing off a clip of M16 rounds. Handling is sharp, precise, and fully track ready with its added degree of chassis tautness and stability, particularly at high speed. While the brakes lack initial bite, there’s plenty of power with a firm squeeze on the lever. The electronics were the most difficult to set quickly, but it’s worth pointing out the added level of adjustment the Tuono offers: eight-level TC, three-level wheelie control, and three-level ABS, each of which can be tweaked within the trio of power-delivery maps.

KTM-1290-Super-Duke-R-static-1
As the good roads unfolded and the miles piled up, the S1000R began to elicit a pleasant kind of confusion. “The BMW offers the luxury. Wait, I mean performance. Okay, maybe both,” Orr enthused. It’s not surprising, given that the S1000R borrows its sport-oriented tech from the stellar HP4. On-the-fly selection of four ride modes (Dynamic Pro, Dynamic, Road, and Rain) instantly affects throttle response, traction control, wheelie control, ABS/anti-rear-lift, and DDC. Another bar switch toggles among Hard, Normal, and Soft DDC settings.
On this particular stretch of road I liked a Dynamic Mode/Hard DDC combo. The direct throttle response combined with modest TC/anti-wheelie intervention allowed just enough corner-exit drama to make me feel like a hero without risk of taking it too far.
“This bike rocks!” Orr said. “It’s faster than heck, but you can use the power it has. The traction control is well dialed in, and in the right mode you can drop the hammer and it delivers that power straight to the ground.” Dudek picked it as his favorite as well, citing its superior comfort and handling. By the time I had descended the mountain on my final stint and spilled onto Interstate-15, the decision was unanimous. Giving the BMW two thumbs-up, I switched to Road Mode, Soft DDC, flicked on the heated grips to low, and set the cruise control for the smooth drone home.

Naked Superbike Specs

KTM-1290-Super-Duke-R-action-4

Classic Formula 1 Engines & sounds

Several examples of Toyota, Honda, Renault, BMW, Ferrari and Cosworth engines.

Watch this amazing compilation of F1 engines on dyno shooting flames:

IMG_7014.JPGIMG_7015.JPG

IMG_7016.JPG

IMG_7013.JPG

IMG_7018.JPG

IMG_7019.JPG

IMG_7017.JPG

IMG_7020.JPG

IMG_7022.JPG

IMG_7023.JPG

IMG_7024.JPG

IMG_7025.JPG

IMG_7026.JPG

IMG_7028.JPG

IMG_7029.JPG

IMG_7027.JPG

IMG_7030.JPG

IMG_7031.JPG

IMG_7033.JPG

IMG_7032.JPG

IMG_7035.JPG

IMG_7037.JPG

IMG_7034.JPG

IMG_7036.JPG

IMG_7039.JPG

IMG_7038.JPG

IMG_7040.JPG

MERCEDES 190 VS BMW M3

Classic this one. Sometimes the slickness of contemporary TV car shows forget the gonzo-like beauty of a good old fashioned burn up. And this is a classic old fashioned burn up.
IMG_6694.JPG
Mercedes-Benz 190E

We’re not sure where or when this was shot, but there’s something pure and honest about the ragged tearup between this Mercedes 190 (don’t think it’s a Cosworth, version) and a BMW M3 E30. We reckon it dates from some time in the early to mid nineties and yes, it’s definitely in France.
IMG_6695.JPG
BMW E30 M3

Any other infos greatly appreciated. Otherwise, sit back and enjoy.

http://youtu.be/ANv83OJk–4

GROUP 5 HERO: BMW 320 TURBO

Of all the racing formulas that produced stunning race cars, Group 5 is one of our favourites.

And this BMW 320 Turbo is a fave among faves.

The formula, which was in its deregulated niceness, was almost the precursor of Group B rally in that there were super fat versions of the road cars. The regulation required only the bonnet, roof, doors and rail panel were left unmodified. What resulted were spectacular racing cars.

We particularly love this guy’s casual stance. And his beard. if anyone can identify the man, we’d like to send him our sincere congratulations on his pure stylish ease…

Look out for a mini series of group 5 wonders!

IMG_1403.JPG

IMG_1404.JPG

BMW M3: THE EVOLUTION.

1986: E30
After completing its brief career in Formula 1, BMW’s Motorsport arm focused all its energy on touring car racing. The BMW M3 E30w was born. The first edition came with a 195 hp, four-cylinder 16-valve power unit. Right from the start the car was a success and in 1987 Italian driver Roberto Ravaglia won the World Touring Car Championship at the wheel of a BMW M3. In the following five years the M3 was the uncontested leader in the international touring car scene, bringing home two European Touring Car Championships and winning the DTM twice. But the M3 was, of course, an equally successful road-going car. Sales reached a heady volume of 17,970 units, including 600 units of the 2.5-litre M3 Sport Evolution version, as well as 765 hand-built convertibles.

IMG_6589.JPG

IMG_6590.JPG

IMG_6591.JPG

1992: E36
The E36 M3, launched in 1992 was voted car of the year in Germany two years on the trot – and in France even gained the questionable moniker ‘car of the century’. Between 1992 and 1996 M-sport built more than 85 four-door racing 3 Series based on the E36 M3 GT, with Johnny Cecotto at the wheel winning the ADAC GT Championship in 1993, and next setting out to conquer the US motor-sport market. In 1995 the car received even more power – 321 hp from 3.2 litres, to be precise – and for the first time the M3’s grunt exceeded 100 hp per litre. Double variable timing was also used for the first time, as well as a six speed gearbox.

IMG_6592.JPG

IMG_6593.JPG

IMG_6594.JPG

2000: E46
Making its debut in the year 2000 the E46 M3 turned up the gauge in all departments. 343 hp. 365 Nm. 5.2 seconds. And the design in turn reflected the increased attitude. One year later the M3 GTR lined up on the starting grid of the American Le Mans Series with a four-litre eight-cylinder under the bonnet for the first time. The racing car with the characteristic air scoops in the bonnet and the powerful rear aerofoil proved superior on the race tracks of the USA and won the Championship in the GT Class. 2003 saw the return of the CSL with its roof, centre console and door panels made of carbon-fibre reinforced plastic. This lean beast was powered by an engine tuned to 360 hp, which gave it an astonishing Nürburgring lap time of 7.50. In 2003. All 1800 units were sold before they hit the forecourt.

IMG_6595.JPG

IMG_6596.JPG

IMG_6597.JPG

2007 E90-series
For the E90, with that marmite design that put quite a few folk off, BMW went with an eight-cylinder engine for the first time in the coupé and the saloon launched shortly afterwards. The new V8 engine generated power of 420 hp from a displacement of 3,999 cubic centimetres. Around 85 percent of the maximum torque of 400Nm could be called up over the enormous rev range of 6,500 rpm. Power was transferred to the rear wheels through a six-speed manual gearbox and a completely new rear-axle differential. Particularly in the coupé, the design engineers once again used lightweight construction. The positive experiences with other M models led to the roof also being made of carbon-fibre reinforced plastic and the engine bonnet was made of aluminium.

IMG_6598.JPG

IMG_6600.JPG

IMG_6599.JPG

2014 BMW M3 / M4
Engine/Drivetrain

BMW has reverted to an inline six cylinder for the new M3 and M4. But unlike the S54 in the E46 M3, the new S55 is turbocharged. Based on the N55 six cylinder, the S55 utilizes VANOS and Valvetronic as well as gasoline direct injection in the cylinder heads. But unlike the N55′s twin-scroll single turbocharger, the S55 utilizes two turbochargers, one turbo per three cylinders. Given all of the heat the engine is capable of producing, BMW has taken great care in ensuring that it is properly controlled, especially knowing that the M3/M4s will see a lot of track time.
The S55 is set to deliver 431 HP and 406 lb-ft of torque. To ensure that nothing untoward happens on the bottom end the S55 employs a forged steel crankshaft. The torque developed by the S55 is fully available from 1,850 to 5,500 RPM which leads one to believe that the turbos selected for use on the S55 are slightly larger than the ones employed on the N54 motor of yore. Two tidbits worth considering are the huge increase in torque over the outgoing V8 and the approximately 25% increase in fuel economy of the S55 over the V8.
Attached to the S55 will be one of two available transmissions. A six speed manual with dry sump lubrication (forced oil feed rather than the gear-train sitting in a ‘splash bath’ of oil) is available. The six speed manual will have some software integration with the ECU in that it will blip the throttle on downshifts (rev-match engine RPM to road RPM). The available third generation M DCT seven speed transmission will offer launch control and stability clutch control. Stability clutch control is an interesting feature that disengages the clutch momentarily, invoking a whiff of power of oversteer when too much understeer is detected by the car’s electronics. Think of it as augmented stability control.

The power from the transmission is delivered to the Active M Differential, a multi-plate electronically collected limited slip differential, via a carbon fiber prop shaft. The carbon fiber shaft saves weight, provides more than adequate strength and reduces inertia in the drivetrain. Of course tying everything together is the software and electronics that monitor vehicle dynamics and intervene based on the requirements of the situation.
Suspension:
The M3/M4 utilize BMW’s proven double pivot strut front suspension and multi-link rear suspension. The front and rear suspensions utilize M specific aluminum components which are light weight and biased towards stiffness. The front suspension has additional stiffening in the form a CFRP strut brace, aluminum stiffening plate, and additional connection points between the sub-frame and the chassis. The downside of the additional stiffening may be additional harshness but the responsiveness gained is beneficial. The suspension features the M Adaptive suspension settings of Comfort, Sport, and Sport +.

Another benefit of the additional stiffening may be an acceptable level of feedback for the electrically-assisted power steering (EPS), which BMW M employs for the first time. It will be interesting to read the reviews of the steering gear to determine how much ‘feedback’ the EPS provides. Since the EPS utilizes software to control its responses, different settings can be utilized ‘on the fly’. The EPS will have Comfort, Sport, and Sport + settings, and the hope is that most drivers will leave it in Sport +.

Regarding the use of EPS however, one would think that BMW would not deploy EPS in this critical set of M cars if they weren’t confident that they had achieved a level of feedback M drivers expect. Braking is provided by M compound brakes and optional M carbon ceramic brakes (with gold brake rotors).

Electronics

There is a good deal of integration between drivetrain and chassis, especially if the M DCT transmission is specified. In addition there is a BMW M Laptimer app available for the driver’s smartphone than we connected via USB cable or the optional phone cradle can record lap data and playback the data graphically on the smartphone’s screen. AN optional heads-up display is also available and it too contains M specific functionality.

The M3/M4 exhibit a degree of technological capability/creativity that were unimaginable when the original M3 was conceived. For better or worse the tight integration of mechanical systems with electronics (and lines and lines of software code) make the new M3/M4 what it is.

IMG_6603.JPG

IMG_6604.JPG

IMG_6605.JPG

IMG_6606.JPG

BMW: A HOMAGE TO M3

BMW M3

The Ultimate Driving Machine…

It was a slogan BMW once slathered across the majority of its marketing material. A slogan that would now struggle to add gravitas to the likes of the bloated X5, the awkwardly-styled 3 Series GT or the barge-like 7 Series, but one that remains credible thanks to one car: the BMW M3.


The F80 designation looks crisp in Yas Marina blue…

It is not often that a vehicle comes along and slashes the rulebook clean in two but in 1986 – when the E30 BMW M3 Coupe was first available for public consumption – it did just that. Brandishing pure racing performance thanks to BMW’s motor sport division and a boot that could swallow even the biggest C&A shopping trip, it was a freak of nature; One of the original Q cars that could be comfortably driven everyday but also thrash the pants off a Porsche should the need arise.

It was on my wall, next to a jet black Lamborghini Countach.

The E46 CSL coupé defined the genre….

But unlike the Countach, it whispered rather than bellowed into the ears of those who desired high performance. After all, then BMW chairman of the board Eberhard von Kuenheim simply wanted to slot a spicy engine into his beloved 3 Series, fettle the damping a bit and make sure the brakes didn’t fade after a few hot laps, not create a supercar.

But even Kuenheim couldn’t have predicted just how delicious his recipe was to taste.

My first bite of the M3 masterpiece wasn’t to come until 14 years after the original car graced UK roads. The E36 M3 had already arrived and riled fans by ditching the favoured four-pot engine of the E30 and ballooning in weight, but that was in the past. The E46 was now here and it was a belter.

A friend of mine had a father who was brazenly reckless with cash and harboured a soft spot for ludicrously quick coupes. He once turned up to my house in a brand new E46 M3 CSL – a lightweight range-topper that not only cost £60,000 at the time but also hid a 3.2-litre straight six under the bonnet. My mum commented on the nice car sat on our driveway but she didn’t have a clue about the cutting-edge flappy paddle gearbox, the carbon fibre roof and precision-cut lightweight 19-inch alloy wheels.

I did and I was physically salivating at the thought of strapping into the lightweight bucket seats.

The profligate pops floored the CSL as soon as we left the 30mph roads of my estate. All three of us (my mate was hunkered in the back) squirmed with the ferocity of acceleration and above the induction roar of the almighty engine, the old man could be heard rattling off figures. “It weighs under 1400kg!” he beamed. “Nought to sixty in under five lads!” he exclaimed. We rounded a bend and I felt the tail of the car step out. Naturally, I went to grab the nearest handle but there wasn’t one on this pared-back machine. My friend’s dad laughed his head off.

That outing had me hooked. I swore to learn to drive the following year (I didn’t, I bought a motorbike instead) and I vowed to experience that aural battering and accelerative ass whooping for myself, be it through owning an M3 (unlikely) or by becoming a motoring journalist and borrowing one (yeah, that).


The M4 Coupe pushes the form forward…

Driving a modern M3 remains a special experience. The squat stance and aggressive styling is the first thing to smack you between the eyes. It isn’t lairy like its Germanic rivals – the Audi RS4 and the Mercedes C63 AMG – but instead remains relatively faithful to the original Q car understatement.

The bulging ‘Power Dome’ on the bonnet that accommodates the engine alludes to its neck-snapping intent and the trademark flared wheel-arches, M-badged side strakes and bonnet scoops provide reference points for those in the know. My first drive in an E46 didn’t fail to disappoint. The Welsh A and B-roads more commonly known as the Evo triangle provided the perfect canvas for some automotive tomfoolery, evoking memories of that gut-wrenching acceleration I’d experienced years before.

I’ve also visited the roads of my youth in an E90 M3; flooring the accelerator on the exact same stretch I first experienced the awesome pulling power of the CSL. It felt as good as it did 14 years ago.

My friend tells me his old man has been divorced twice since that first driving experience but one thing remains the same.

He still owns a BMW M3.

Proudly powered by WordPress | Theme: Baskerville 2 by Anders Noren.

Up ↑